LIVE DISPATCH
• Arctic Geopolitics: From Frozen Frontier to Global Contest • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Bridging the Fifth-Generation Gap: India's Su-57E Dilemma, AMCA, and Strategic Autonomy • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Regulation as Power? The EU, US and China in the Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • The New Defence Architecture: Deconstructing the India-Belgium Geostrategic Win • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Beyond Oil: Saudi Arabia's Civil Nuclear Deal with the United States • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • The Myth of Mankind's Inheritance: China, the US, and the Battle for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • China's Surveillance Architecture in the Bay of Bengal and Its Strategic Implications • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • A Reformer for an Institution in Decline: What does the Next Secretary-General Inherits? • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Silent Depths, Loud Signals: Nuclear Deterrence Infrastructure and the Crisis-Stability Costs of India’s Indo-Pacific Maritime Partnerships • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition • Arctic Geopolitics: From Frozen Frontier to Global Contest • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Bridging the Fifth-Generation Gap: India's Su-57E Dilemma, AMCA, and Strategic Autonomy • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Regulation as Power? The EU, US and China in the Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • The New Defence Architecture: Deconstructing the India-Belgium Geostrategic Win • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Beyond Oil: Saudi Arabia's Civil Nuclear Deal with the United States • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • The Myth of Mankind's Inheritance: China, the US, and the Battle for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • China's Surveillance Architecture in the Bay of Bengal and Its Strategic Implications • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • A Reformer for an Institution in Decline: What does the Next Secretary-General Inherits? • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Silent Depths, Loud Signals: Nuclear Deterrence Infrastructure and the Crisis-Stability Costs of India’s Indo-Pacific Maritime Partnerships • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition
World March 27, 2021 2416 Reads

Growing Islamic Radicalism in Central Asia

M
By Mahima Chouhan
Author • Centre for Security & Strategic Studies
Growing Islamic Radicalism in Central Asia
Share Analysis:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STRATEGIC TAKEAWAYS

Ever since the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991, the region of Central Asia has emerged as an intriguing field of politics, religion and security. The establishment of these newly formed republics was not only challenged by the Soviet Union's long-standing authoritative rule but the gradual revival of Islamic values particularly in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan which further raised some important questions. Islamic fear mongering and extremism has long been perceived as a major “threat to the national security”. Political authorities have often resorted to tough measures to suppress such Islamic faith as they consider these as perilous. Russia being the closest ally of Central Asian countries is working for the regional stability by its multi-lateral vehicle Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). However, scholars and political decision makers have questioned the extent to which Islamic radicalism has jeopardized the security in Central Asia.

Decades of communist atheism has restricted all formal and public role of religion; sharia law was banned, thousands of mosques were destroyed, religious practices were criminalized. However, despite the attempts of Soviet’s anti-religious practices, Islam never left this region. There were hundreds of underground mosques and religious schools that influenced the traditional Hanafi Islamic education in Central Asia. These underground study groups were attended by a lot of scholars who then influenced the religious thinking there. After a while, the Soviet authorities acknowledged their futile efforts of limiting religious expression, and understood the significance of religious freedom for their survival. Thus, to institutionalize Islamic practices they created SADUM (Spiritual Administration of the Muslims of Central Asia and Kazakhstan) in 1943. With this, the Islamic thoughts and practices began to flourish publicly in Central Asia and broadened its scope to influence people from far off places. Furthermore, the foreign policies of Gorbachev provided new possibilities for the religious beliefs and institutions.

Along with the moderate Islamic beliefs and practices, there was a gradual emergence of Salafi Wahabi thought. Wahhabism has been described as ‘orthodox’, or as Islamic extremism which seeks to ‘purify’ Islam by advocating early Islamic values. The focus of such Islamic radicalization and ‘fundamentalism’ was found in specific localities within the region. The densely populated and ethnically rich area of Ferghana Valley became the epicenter of Islamic radicalism. This interaction of radical and violent Islamic views with Hanafi values and tribal practices led to the development of unique characteristics of Islam in Central Asia. Such characteristics show a different picture of Islam than that which is seen in West Asia.

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the Central Asian countries began to experience a resurgence of Islam in the public domain. Construction of new mosques, establishment of religious institutes, restoration of Hajj pilgrimage and most importantly, the beginning of religious learning and practices. Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iran financed this religious development and influenced the local Islamic practices and beliefs. Due to this, the Central Asian countries were opened up to a greater Muslim world, experiencing a revival of the Islamic values. Now, with foreign imams coming to preach the conservative Wahhabi philosophy more seriously, it has made a rapid and intense inroad in Central Asia.

Several radical Islamist movements and organisations existed in Central Asia since the Tsarist era. The most prominent radical Islamist movement occurred in 1980s with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Growing interaction between the Central Asia’s Muslims and the Mujahideen fighters intensified the wave of radicalism in the region. Emergence of Islamic movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) in 1992 further spread the radical messagethrough madrassas and mosques. This movement was inspired by Wahhabism and Deobandism and was mostly operated in the Namangan region of Uzbekistan. Tahir Yuldashev, founder of IMU had once said in the only interview he has ever given that “The goal of IMU activities is the creation of an Islamic State. We declared a jihad in order to create a religious system and government. We want the model of Islam which is nothing like in Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan or Saudi Arabia.” It has a close relationship with Al Qaeda and Taliban and carried out its first major violent suppression in 1999 in Tashkent. Since then, it is active in various terrorist operations in Central Asia and even abroad. It seeks to establish an Islamic state of Uzbekistan and impose the Sharia law. Various scholars have tried to club all the Islamic movements of these regions in one chain, however the nature and characteristics of it are not uniform and there is a need to look at the specificities of each, as the indigenous nomadic population of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan accepted radical Islam more slowly and differently, and the sedentary people of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan converted more readily.

Despite the fact that the rise of Islamic radicalism in Central Asia is related to external influences, it has been bolstered by domestic events in the region. The repressive form of government, poverty, rampant corruption, unemployment, interethnic crisis and most importantly the politicization of religion has deteriorated socio-economic conditions, which have triggered a regrouping of forces for Islamist resurgence in Central Asia. Thus, the autocratic policies of government along with the fundamentalist thinking is considered conducive for the intensification of extremist activities. It must be noted that the socio economic crisis is not a sufficient and necessary condition for the spread of radical thought. Radical Islamic groups have emerged within the well-educated class as well. For example, the suicide killings in Central Asia were conducted by educated ladies who belonged to upper class and affluent families. The political figures of Central Asia utilized Islam as both an oppositional force and to legitimize their political regimes. As the very first President of independent Uzbekistan, Karimov was seen as holding Quran in one hand and constitution in the other on his first day of inauguration. Later, in mid 1990s, Uzbekistan resorted to harsh repressive policies by curtailing religious freedom. And by the turn of 21st century almost all other states restricted religious and political freedoms by tightening controls over spiritual places and practices. The reason for such transformation is complex and various factors were discussed extensively by scholars ranging from the concept of securitization, struggle against ‘early political Islam’ to the legitimization of regime.

To say that the central Asian regime would be a hub of radicalism and extremism is still doubtful. Though the jihadis and radical group have made inroads, they are still less in number. A large number of Central Asian Muslims perceive themselves as the ‘indigenous and traditional Muslims’, with strong ties to their local practices and beliefs rather than adopting an extremist position. The state has also managed to keep the marginal clandestine groups at bay by foreign as well as regional assistance. How long these actors can keep up the pressure, is the real question.

Pic Courtesy-Davlat Nur at unsplash.com

(The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent the views of the CESCUBE.)

Mahima Chouhan
About Mahima Chouhan →

Mahima Chouhan is a Postgraduate student of Politics with Specialization in International Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University. Her area of interest lies in the cultural and political aspects of West Asia, Central Asia and the challenges of Internally Displaced people and refugees.

Related Strategic Analysis