LIVE DISPATCH
• The New Defence Architecture: Deconstructing the India-Belgium Geostrategic Win • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Beyond Oil: Saudi Arabia's Civil Nuclear Deal with the United States • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • The Myth of Mankind's Inheritance: China, the US, and the Battle for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • China's Surveillance Architecture in the Bay of Bengal and Its Strategic Implications • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • A Reformer for an Institution in Decline: What does the Next Secretary-General Inherits? • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Silent Depths, Loud Signals: Nuclear Deterrence Infrastructure and the Crisis-Stability Costs of India’s Indo-Pacific Maritime Partnerships • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition • Beyond Ukraine: Understanding Putin's Vision of Russian Power • Silicon Sovereignty: How Semiconductors Are Redrawing Global Power Hierarchies • The Negative Impact of US–Iran War on the Pacific Region • The New Defence Architecture: Deconstructing the India-Belgium Geostrategic Win • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Beyond Oil: Saudi Arabia's Civil Nuclear Deal with the United States • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • The Myth of Mankind's Inheritance: China, the US, and the Battle for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • China's Surveillance Architecture in the Bay of Bengal and Its Strategic Implications • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • A Reformer for an Institution in Decline: What does the Next Secretary-General Inherits? • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Silent Depths, Loud Signals: Nuclear Deterrence Infrastructure and the Crisis-Stability Costs of India’s Indo-Pacific Maritime Partnerships • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition • Beyond Ukraine: Understanding Putin's Vision of Russian Power • Silicon Sovereignty: How Semiconductors Are Redrawing Global Power Hierarchies • The Negative Impact of US–Iran War on the Pacific Region
Politics September 19, 2021 2252 Reads

Takeaways from Kamala Harris Visit to Southeast Asia

G
By Gaurav Sen
Author • Centre for Security & Strategic Studies
Takeaways from Kamala Harris Visit to Southeast Asia
Share Analysis:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STRATEGIC TAKEAWAYS

As the world slowly coming with the terms of the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, many observers said that the unexpected US debacle on Afghan soil gathers semblance of its pack up from Saigon, Vietnam. The scathing rupture in US credibility, that it tried to maintain for so many years, has also become apparent. The allies all over the world set in motion to analyze the commitments, Washington putting forward, with the fear of abandonment becoming a reality in their calculation. However, America at the crucial juncture could not let the potential subsidiary in its Indo-pacific scheme to wonder in substantive confusion over its reputation, that too, when the security threats extracting from China’s hegemonic design are not a distant possibility. 

Vice President of the United States of America has undertaken a tour of Southeast Asia to reassure about the continuance of Washington’s long-term strategic partnership with the residing countries. The trip of Kamala Harris to Singapore and Vietnam has been planned as a supplement after the Defense secretary Llyod Austin and Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman have taken the tour of Southeast Asia including stops in Singapore and Vietnam. The purpose of the trip was to strengthen partnerships with the Singapore and Vietnam and with the Southeast Asia altogether. The effort of these consistent trip is to shoutout America’s return in the Southeast Asia and to stem the re-engagement with “a critically important region in the world”, which have struck with a steady halt during President Trump tenure and got a slow start with the coming of Biden into the white house.

Vice President speech in the Singapore started with the reference of Afghanistan, to shrug off the doubts of America’s declinist turn, similarly reiterating that ‘we have achieved what we went there to do’, highlighting USA’s multidimensional approach to ‘continue to advance our interests in other regions, including this region’. After an aversive episode of ‘America first’ and unduly rhetoric for need united against the communist China, US leadership seems poised with the local awareness of the desire of a more positive program of American engagement, which will reinstate America as sole security provider in the wider Indo Pacific where “some of its closest allies and strongest of partners resides”. USA have endured interest and the commitments in the region and these commitments inadvertently includes security. Nevertheless, the vice president echoed the security aspects of US commitment to the region in the ‘free and open Indo-pacific vision’ and a South china Sea free from Beijing Coercion is the most defining factors that come along with freedom of navigation in the neutral waters of these maritime estate. Kamala Harris shows concern over ‘Beijing continued coercion’ and ‘intimidation to make claims’ of most of the South China Sea. The visit of the Changi Naval Base and mentioning of the U.S. Navy ship, The USS Tulsa, represent the U.S. ever deepened and enduring security partnership in the region. In the Singapore, Vice President could be seen reassuring the Southeast Government that despite its intention to remain strongly engaged in region it does not force countries to choose between itself and China. However, the focus shall continue to include the energy, climate, economic cooperation, the primary goal is to secure the region from China’s coercion by capacity building program of its allies.

Earlier, it has been the Quad and South Korea that largely comprised the US’s strategic plans in the Indo-Pacific, but the timely sense prevailed in the US’s leadership that it would alone not suffice the requirements of the Washington’s ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’ desires. Not only the Southeast Asia goes unnoticed but critically at the point when it was head-to-head with China over South China Sea dispute. The Kaleidoscopic nature of South China Sea, put it right into the epicenter of the Indo-Pacific security structure with an unavoidable invitation to the Southeast Asian states to the party. Vice President in her address attacks China saying ‘China continues to undermine rule-based order and threaten the sovereignty of nations’ and calls Vietnam to join the United states against China’s ‘bullying’ in the strategically important seaway.

Despite all the efforts the U.S. strategy in the Southeast Asia still lacks coherence with its larger Indo-Pacific strategy, the co-vary between both still unproven due to the misalignment in the perception between policymakers in Washington and their Southeast Asian partners, occurred majorly due to the President Trump’s less receptive approach towards the regional aspirations. Vice President though, talks about the ‘ASEAN’ as a pivotal regional structure for the Indo-Pacific maritime security but the absence of Thailand and Philippines, America’s treaty allies, from this itinerary is striking. The proposal of strengthening partnership with the Southeast Asian nations still lacks clear roadmap, the trip provides no answer how US will deepen its engagement and how it will address multiple concern regarding the region. Invisibility of any ‘AUKUS’ type structure, in which USA instigating the development of the Nuclear-Powered Submarine (SSNs) for the Australia with the help of United Kingdom, is a matter of worry for regional actors. The capacity building program in the Southeast Asia cannot be successful without technology transfer and financial assistance as most of the Southeast Asian allies lacks the same.

Despite multiple claims of the regions prior status to the US regional security structure, the Biden administration’s Southeast Asia policy largely regarded as disappointing, which is deeply troubled and follows the footsteps of its predecessor Trump. The Kamala Harris trip however, do not fix the trouble for Biden Southeast Policy, it can regulate the skepticism brewed regarding its absence in the Southeast Asia.

Notes

1. Kamala Harris’ Southeast Asia Visit Shows Biden’s Southeast Asia Policy Still Lacks a Clear Roadmap – The Diplomat: https://thediplomat.com/2021/08/kamala-harris-southeast-asia-visit-shows-bidens-southeast-asia-policy-still-lacks-a-clear-roadmap/

2. Why Biden has been a disappointment to Southeast Asia so far | South China Morning Post: https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3136344/why-biden-has-been-disappointment-southeast-asia-so-far

3. Kamala Harris joins diplomatic charm offensive in South East Asia - BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58277226

4. Remarks by Vice President Harris on the Indo-Pacific Region | The White House: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/08/24/remarks-by-vice-president-harris-on-the-indo-pacific-region/

5. What did Kamala Harris’ trip do for US engagement in Southeast Asia?: https://www.brookings.edu/podcast-episode/what-did-kamala-harris-trip-do-for-us-engagement-in-southeast-asia/

6. Kamala Harris’s south-east Asia trip reveals limits of US strategy | US foreign policy | The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/27/kamala-harriss-south-east-asia-trip-reveals-limits-of-us-strategy

7. In Southeast Asia, Kamala Harris Rebukes China - The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/24/world/asia/kamala-harris-singapore-vietnam.html

8. Kamala Harris, Southeast Asia and the balancing act nations face between US and China | South China Morning Post: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3146691/kamala-harriss-southeast-asia-visit-highlights-balancing-act

9. Kamala Harris joins diplomatic charm offensive in South East Asia - BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58277226

10. Kamala Harris tries to improve Southeast Asia ties as China prods from sidelines: https://www.livemint.com/politics/policy/kamala-harris-tries-to-improve-southeast-asia-ties-as-china-prods-from-sidelines-11629981884537.html

11. Kamala Harris ends Asia tour with fresh jab at China https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/kamala-harris-ends-asia-tour-with-fresh-jab-at-china/article36127019.ece

Pic Courtesy- The Whitehouse official webpage

(The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent views of CESCUBE.)

Gaurav Sen
About Gaurav Sen →

Gaurav Sen is a graduate from Delhi University. He is currently doing his Masters in International relations from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. His research area includes IR theories, Great Power competition in Indo-Pacific, Maritime Security, Emerging Warfare Concepts, and Military Strategies.

Related Strategic Analysis