LIVE DISPATCH
• Arctic Geopolitics: From Frozen Frontier to Global Contest • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Bridging the Fifth-Generation Gap: India's Su-57E Dilemma, AMCA, and Strategic Autonomy • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Regulation as Power? The EU, US and China in the Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • The New Defence Architecture: Deconstructing the India-Belgium Geostrategic Win • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Beyond Oil: Saudi Arabia's Civil Nuclear Deal with the United States • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • The Myth of Mankind's Inheritance: China, the US, and the Battle for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • China's Surveillance Architecture in the Bay of Bengal and Its Strategic Implications • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • A Reformer for an Institution in Decline: What does the Next Secretary-General Inherits? • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Silent Depths, Loud Signals: Nuclear Deterrence Infrastructure and the Crisis-Stability Costs of India’s Indo-Pacific Maritime Partnerships • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition • Arctic Geopolitics: From Frozen Frontier to Global Contest • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Bridging the Fifth-Generation Gap: India's Su-57E Dilemma, AMCA, and Strategic Autonomy • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Regulation as Power? The EU, US and China in the Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • The New Defence Architecture: Deconstructing the India-Belgium Geostrategic Win • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Beyond Oil: Saudi Arabia's Civil Nuclear Deal with the United States • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • The Myth of Mankind's Inheritance: China, the US, and the Battle for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • China's Surveillance Architecture in the Bay of Bengal and Its Strategic Implications • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • A Reformer for an Institution in Decline: What does the Next Secretary-General Inherits? • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Silent Depths, Loud Signals: Nuclear Deterrence Infrastructure and the Crisis-Stability Costs of India’s Indo-Pacific Maritime Partnerships • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition
Politics August 15, 2022 1987 Reads

Myanmar Crisis and what the world needs to do

G
By Gaurav Sen
Author • Centre for Security & Strategic Studies
Myanmar Crisis and what the world needs to do
Share Analysis:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STRATEGIC TAKEAWAYS

After a military takeover, Myanmar is on the verge of collapse. Following the military coup, there has been bloodshed and instability, and the nation is also severely suffering from COVID-19 and the ensuing economic catastrophe. Former State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi, who was condemned to years' imprisonment by the regime while still being tried on other charges, may be held for a number of years after living under home confinement for nearly fifteen in the 1990s and the early 2000s. 

However, the 54-million Southeast Asian nation is fading from the news as the world's focus shifts to other crucial global challenges. Myanmar appears to have entirely reverted to authoritarianism in the meantime, with no sign of hope for the independence of its people.

The political, health, and economic crises in Burma are closely connected together and do not exist as distinct occurrences. The majority of people had great aspirations for the developing democratic system, particularly the younger generation who had grown up with extensive freedom of expression and connection to the outside world thanks to the internet. Their dreams were dashed by the coup, and many young people became resolved to either overthrow the military or commit suicide. After a short time in which demonstrations were largely permitted, the Tatmadaw started to ruthlessly repress the civil disobedience movement (CDM). By mid-September 2021, more than 1,000 people had been killed and 6,000 more had been arrested. As a result, some resistance activists have begun to turn radical, increasing the danger of a state breakdown.

Rising emergency needs currently threaten the country, and an oncoming financial catastrophe appears more likely as a result of pandemic-related value-chain disruptions, a shrinking labour force, food insecurity, resource devastation, and cash difficulties at home. Additionally, the country's external position is perilous as a result of capital flight and new sanctions from western nations. The interconnectivity of various economic problems in Myanmar has increased the complexity of the situation. Any civic turmoil has a severe effect on the domestic industry in a number of ways. The bloodshed that followed the coup and decreased productivity and growth of the nation's primary economic drivers—human and physical capital—also decreased the return on investment for economic capital. Additionally, the coup's negative repercussions have always increased the pace of capital decline in the country. Since the COVID-19 epidemic began in 2020, and particularly after the army took control of the country, the majority of businesses have had declines in sales, cash flow problems, and challenges using banking and internet services. As a result, the population has suffered in an environment where the coup and pandemic's cumulative effects lost Myanmar some 1.6 million jobs in 2021. While the armed war had a significant negative impact on rural farmers, the manufacturing, apparel, tourist, and retail and hospitality had year-over-year job losses of 31%, 27%, and 30%, respectively.

The international reaction to the issue has been mediocre at best, and Myanmar has not received the attention it merits. The major nations have been concentrating on some other problems such as those in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, and now Ukraine while also responding to the worldwide pandemic. It seems sense that the West, in particular, thinks it has limited power and few valid choices to affect what happens on the ground. Although the U.S., EU, and UK have implemented a number of penalties against regime officials and army businesses, these have had very little of an effect on the government's ability to function. For a while to come, the junta will be a cause of unrest. The army will continue to be a solitary, rogue player due to its widespread war crimes, international sanctions, and growing allegiance to Moscow and Beijing if it suppresses the civilian opposition in Myanmar. Furthermore, democracy and respect for human rights remain essential components of American foreign policy. Because of the regime's worldwide authoritarian resurgence's backing from both Russia and China, only a democratic, federal Myanmar can long-term stabilise the nation. In fact, the fight for democracy in Myanmar is similar to the one going on in the US right now. Both are battling tense internal national identity conflicts that are based on disagreements over matters of race, religion, and individual liberties.

These measures should also involve collaboration with like-minded ASEAN neighbours on a bilateral level, particularly with Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore, who have spearheaded Southeast Asia's countercoup efforts. Finally, U.S. policy should attempt to enlist the help of India and Thailand, which are more receptive to the junta, as well as Australia and Japan, two of its democratic friends. The United States should reassess its dedication to the country's freedom as the consequences of the coup in Myanmar continued to destabilise the region, wreak havoc on its people, and destroy its economy. It is important to remember Myanmar's fight for democratization, and the national defense and values of the United States depend greatly on how the coup is resolved.

Notes

1. In a World of Crises, Don’t Forget Myanmar. https://thediplomat.com/2022/07/in-a-world-of-crises-dont-forget-myanmar/

2. Myanmar: Coup, COVID-19, and the ongoing economic crisis. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/coup-covid-19-and-the-ongoing-economic-crisis/

3. Why is the Myanmar crisis such a challenge for ASEAN? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/3/why-is-the-myanmar-crisis-such-a-challenge-for-asean

4. One Year On from the Myanmar Coup. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/myanmar/one-year-myanmar-coup

5. The Myanmar crisis: Escalating humanitarian emergencies. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/the-myanmar-crisis-escalating-humanitarian-emergencies/

6. Myanmar’s Troubled History: Coups, Military Rule, and Ethnic Conflict. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/myanmar-history-coup-military-rule-ethnic-conflict-rohingya

7. What you need to know about the crisis in Myanmar. https://www.rescue.org/article/what-you-need-know-about-crisis-myanmar

8. Myanmar’s “Triple Crisis”: Impact on the Pro-Democracy Movement. https://www.mei.edu/publications/myanmars-triple-crisis-impact-pro-democracy-movement

Image Courtesy: Nandan Singh Bhaisora

(The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent views of CESCUBE.)

Gaurav Sen
About Gaurav Sen →

Gaurav Sen is a graduate from Delhi University. He is currently doing his Masters in International relations from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. His research area includes IR theories, Great Power competition in Indo-Pacific, Maritime Security, Emerging Warfare Concepts, and Military Strategies.

Related Strategic Analysis