LIVE DISPATCH
• Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition • Beyond Ukraine: Understanding Putin's Vision of Russian Power • Silicon Sovereignty: How Semiconductors Are Redrawing Global Power Hierarchies • The Negative Impact of US–Iran War on the Pacific Region • BRICS Expansion and the Multipolar Moment: Opportunity or Strategic Contradiction? • Foot-Dragging as Feminism: Iran, South Korea, and the Ungovernable Body • Beyond Proximity: Why the UAE Occupies a Growing Place in Iran’s Strategic Calculus • Why Fiji Matters: The New Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific Islands • The Long Shadow of 1953: Understanding the Iran–US Conflict • Border Fencing and National security: India’s Strategy along the Bangladesh Border • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition • Beyond Ukraine: Understanding Putin's Vision of Russian Power • Silicon Sovereignty: How Semiconductors Are Redrawing Global Power Hierarchies • The Negative Impact of US–Iran War on the Pacific Region • BRICS Expansion and the Multipolar Moment: Opportunity or Strategic Contradiction? • Foot-Dragging as Feminism: Iran, South Korea, and the Ungovernable Body • Beyond Proximity: Why the UAE Occupies a Growing Place in Iran’s Strategic Calculus • Why Fiji Matters: The New Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific Islands • The Long Shadow of 1953: Understanding the Iran–US Conflict • Border Fencing and National security: India’s Strategy along the Bangladesh Border
Politics February 16, 2021 1410 Reads

Hong Kong Crises: An Update

K
By Krupa Vasani
Author • Centre for Security & Strategic Studies
Hong Kong Crises: An Update
Share Analysis:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STRATEGIC TAKEAWAYS

Hong Kong has been witnessing a political crisis from June 2019. Millions of people took to streets to protest against the controversial expatriation law passed by the government. The political unrest in Hong Kong is still going and there seems to be no end to it. The mandate of anti-government protestors has increased as they call for greater freedom and democracy in the country which is trying to suppress the rights of its people. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Hong Kong has been one of the territories which the Chinese have claimed to be a part of mainland China. Initially a British colony, Hong Kong became a part of China's special administrative region. Hong Kong has a 'one country-two systems policy' where, even though it’s a part of the Chinese special administrative zone, it can have its own administration along with trade and economic relations with other countries. However, the executive, judicial and legislative powers of the government of Hong Kong are devolved from the Chinese government.

On 30th June, a new national security law was passed in Hong Kong by China. According the new changes in the extradition law, countries like China, Taiwan, and Macau, who do not have extradition treaties with Hong Kong will be allowed to make extradition requests. This law came into being when a Hong Kong man murdered his girlfriend and was wanted by the Taiwan police. While the Hong Kong Chief Executive, assured the people that every case of extradition will be reviewed and political crimes will not be covered by the law, people of Hong Kong are not assured by it. People took to streets to protest against this law as critics’ fear that the law will be used by China to pressurize Hong Kong’s pro-democracy and anti-China political activists to China. People are concerned that if the political activists are extradited to China, they will be subjected to China’s legal system which according to many Human Rights Groups uses torture, arbitrary detentions and unfair trails amongst other things. People took to streets to protest against this law as they do not trust China’s judicial system and are worried about the safety of Hong Kong people. Hence, since the declaration of the bill, millions of people are protesting against the bill as it harms the people of Hong Kong and its future.

The peaceful protests were joined by almost everyone from the city. But the protests soon turned violent, when the police used tear gas, water cannon, batons and even rubber bullets on the people to disperse the peacefully protesting crowds. These tactics have been criticized highly by the international agencies and organizations. There has been a small group of protestors who have turned violent against the police officers, majority of the movement has been peaceful. They have staged strikes, surrounded police stations, shut down airports and led huge marches. This has only led to the movement becoming wider as more people joined in, and also broader, as now people are also protesting against the erosion of rights and freedoms which they were guaranteed.

People of Hong Kong are not happy with Chinese mediation in the city and the kind of power it holds on the people of Hong Kong. China and Hong have had a complex political relationship and the extradition bill gives China more power over Hong Kong. According to the ‘one country-two system’ policy, China agreed that Hong Kong would operate as a democratic entity and the people of Hong Kong would have all the freedoms and rights which a democracy is supposed to have. This bill by many has been seen as a mediation by the Chinese government in the governance of Hong Kong, thereby violating the agreement which granted Hong Kong, its autonomy.

One of the demands of the people of Hong Kong has been met – the extradition bill has been withdrawn. This has given the people hope that their other demands too will be taken under consideration. The demands apart from the withdrawal of the bill are – a commission of enquiry into the police brutality which had been outrightly refused by the authorities, retracting the classification of the protests as ‘riots’, amnesty for arrested protestors and dual universal suffrage for both legislative council and position of chief executive.

All international actors are also closely observing how China reacts to the protest movement going on. China has refrained from using the military for intervention to break the movement. Many scholars feel that the reason behind lack of military intervention is that China does not want to face more backlash from the international community especially after the pandemic. But this has not stopped China from playing a part in movement. While hailing the bill as a crucial change which would ensure safety in Hong Kong and protestors as separatists who are unnecessarily rebelling against the state, China has used its state media to paint the protestors in a negative light.

Many activists and protestors have urged the international onlookers and actors to help their cause against China. While the pandemic may have tamed the protests and refrained people from crowding the streets, the movement has not died down at all. Instead, the movement and the protestors’ aspirations to restore the status quo in Hong Kong has heightened. The arrests of the pro-democracy activists and the innocent protestors has just highlighted China's brutal crackdown on the democratic rights and freedoms of the people and has just proved how integral the protest movement is.

While the pro-democracy movements are important for the restoration of the rights of people, the political unrest in Hong Kong has costed its economy. The unrest mixed with pandemic along with the uncertainties of US-China trade war, sent the economy of the country into a recession for the first time in a decade. Hong Kong gets a huge revenue from tourism, which too has been impacted negatively due to the current pandemic and protests. While protestors were able make the authorities to concede to one its demands, the movement for fulfillment of other demands is still on. The political crises are considered by many to be never-ending. While most of the people inside the city remain safe, they worry about their future.

Pic Courtesy-Erin Song at unsplash.com

(The views expressed are personal views of the author and do not represent the views of CESCUBE or its office bearers.)

Krupa Vasani
About Krupa Vasani →

Krupa Vasani is a current Scholar at The Vedica’s Scholar Program, New Delhi and is pursuing her MBA in Management and Leadership. An undergraduate from O. P Jindal Global University, Krupa holds a bachelors in International Relations. Over the course of three years as an undergraduate, Krupa has developed an interest in the Security and Strategic Studies and Development Sector. Indian Foreign Policy, South South Cooperation and the Strategy in Indo-Pacific and South Asian Politics and the emerging Quadrilateral Diplomacy are some of her areas of interest. She is currently associated with CESCUBE as part time researcher.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Strategic Analysis