LIVE DISPATCH
• Arctic Geopolitics: From Frozen Frontier to Global Contest • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Bridging the Fifth-Generation Gap: India's Su-57E Dilemma, AMCA, and Strategic Autonomy • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Regulation as Power? The EU, US and China in the Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • The New Defence Architecture: Deconstructing the India-Belgium Geostrategic Win • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Beyond Oil: Saudi Arabia's Civil Nuclear Deal with the United States • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • The Myth of Mankind's Inheritance: China, the US, and the Battle for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • China's Surveillance Architecture in the Bay of Bengal and Its Strategic Implications • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • A Reformer for an Institution in Decline: What does the Next Secretary-General Inherits? • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Silent Depths, Loud Signals: Nuclear Deterrence Infrastructure and the Crisis-Stability Costs of India’s Indo-Pacific Maritime Partnerships • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition • Arctic Geopolitics: From Frozen Frontier to Global Contest • From Physical Borders to Intelligent Borders: The Evolution of India's Border Security Architecture • Bridging the Fifth-Generation Gap: India's Su-57E Dilemma, AMCA, and Strategic Autonomy • AI Driven Cyberwarfare and National Security • Regulation as Power? The EU, US and China in the Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence • The Continuing U.S. Regime-Change Toolkit: Color Revolutions, Political Influence, and Vietnam • The New Defence Architecture: Deconstructing the India-Belgium Geostrategic Win • Digital Pathways to Extremism: An Investigative Study of ISIS and Al-Qaeda's Use of Digital Platforms in India • Beyond Oil: Saudi Arabia's Civil Nuclear Deal with the United States • Strategic Autonomy in the Age of Weaponised Interdependence: India’s Geopolitical Dilemma • The Myth of Mankind's Inheritance: China, the US, and the Battle for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone • China’s Grey-Zone Strategy in the Indian Ocean: Implications for India’s Maritime Security • China's Surveillance Architecture in the Bay of Bengal and Its Strategic Implications • Europe’s Digital Dependence: Can the EU Achieve Strategic Autonomy? • A Reformer for an Institution in Decline: What does the Next Secretary-General Inherits? • Cuba’s Economic Crisis and Strategic Relevance: A Peripheral State in Renewed Great Power Competition • Silent Depths, Loud Signals: Nuclear Deterrence Infrastructure and the Crisis-Stability Costs of India’s Indo-Pacific Maritime Partnerships • Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture • Securing India's Digital Frontiers: Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategic Responses in the Age of Hybrid Warfare • Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation • Prism of Dragon’s Maritime Assertiveness: Regional Implications and India’s Strategic Options • Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel • The Architecture of Cooperation: Navigating East Asia's Geopolitical Landscape • The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral • From Civil Nuclear Power to Nuclear Hedging: Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Emerging Nuclear Security Dilemma in the Middle East • Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security • The Invisible Front: China-Pakistan Grey-Zone Operations • Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy • India's Agentic AI Strategy Needs Authority Budgets before Autonomy Scales • India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability • Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations • Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? • Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 • Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation • The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference • Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics • Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia • Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific • Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition
Terrorism April 30, 2021 2786 Reads

Hizb-ut-Tahrir in Central Asia: Building social support

M
By Mahima Chouhan
Author • Centre for Security & Strategic Studies
Hizb-ut-Tahrir in Central Asia: Building social support
Share Analysis:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STRATEGIC TAKEAWAYS

Oliver Roy, one of the leading French political scientists who worked extensively on "a different view of radical Islam", distinguishes Islamism and neo-fundamentalism. While differentiating these two tendencies, he defines that the former seeks to Islamize society by autocratic means from top down, however the latter aims to do the same but through a bottom-up approach. Hizb-ut-Tahrir al Islami, one of the emerging radical group falls rather ambiguously, under the category of neo fundamentalism. It stands apart from other clandestine groups on various strands but most importantly is forbidding the use of violence to achieve its goal of an Islamic state. Although it has a massive international presence in the Middle East, Britain, Indonesia, Bangladesh, it is however most active in the Central Asian region. 

There are no exact numbers of HuT members in Central Asia, but it is estimated to be between 20,000 and 100,000 are active members. Most of its members are drawn from the university students, teachers, factory workers and unemployed population.

With the aim of creating an Islamic caliphate state, Hizb-ut-Tahrir (HuT) was founded in 1953 by an Islamic scholar of Palestine named Taqi al-Din al-Nabhani in east Jerusalem. It seeks to unite all Muslim territories within a single state, caliphate, and wishes to create a sharia based Islamic government which will regulate all the aspects of human life through Islamic law or sharia. To achieve its goal, the organization follows a three-stage programme of action which can be characterized as the recruitment of members, then the Islamization of society and the state followed by the final stage where the Islamic state is established, and the message of Jihad is carried to the world. It is viciously anti-western and anti-Semitic and is believed that the western style of democratic capitalism has diverted the Muslim people from Islam. While HuT as an organization believes in non-violent approach, it does operate as an ideological vanguard that acknowledges violence as necessary to overthrow the secular regimes.

Though there are number of factors which has influenced the growth of Hizb ut Tahrir in Central Asia, the political void formed by the collapse of Soviet Union has provided fertile soil for it to achieve support in the changing political order. The ideological vacuum created during the post-Soviet era also gave the organization an easy hand to spread their message of Islam. Furthermore, the poor socio-economic conditions and the authoritative regime of this area attracted the population towards the prospect of an Islamic state. The excluded Uzbek ethnic minorities in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan considers HuT as an opportunity to abandon the repressive regime. Though earlier its emergence in Central Asia was only seen as an Uzbek phenomenon, since the late 1990s it absorbed the other central regions too. With the large influence of HuT’s ideology in particularly Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan, the governments have responded by various repressive measures against the members and supporters. There is no specific reason for the minimal presence of HuT in Turkmenistan but some scholars have argued that the severe state repression has left no space for its ideology to gain a foothold.

Interestingly, though the Hizb ut Tahrir believes in the strict interpretation of sharia and Islam, it uses modern technology like the internet to propagate its ideology. To draw young people towards its ideas, Hizb ut Tahrir distributes CDs and literature such as The Institutions of State in the Khalifah, and has a well-maintained website with their thoughts, messages and other information. It has also been found organizing various seminars and public discussions, utilizing every arena in the countries where the group is not banned. Moreover, the large number of social media followers on Facebook shows the strong influence of the outfit. According to US online journal Combating Terrorism Exchange (CTX), Hizb ut Tahrir is gradually increasing its social capital, particularly among the youth by keeping away from violent activities directly. Hizb followers are using various spaces to influence individuals. Mosques are being used after the prayer times to recruit individuals by handing out pamphlets and going into dialogue. Universities are also used to push their global ideology by holding halaaqs or study circles, particularly through the Muslim organizations. In Turkmen prison, it has been found that Hizb ut Tahrir is very active among prisoners and influences them with their organizational ideas. Various splinter groups of Hizb ut Tahrir like Akramiylar in Uzbekistan, Hizb un-Nusrat, Al-Muhajiroun, Palestinian Islamic Jihad has also broadened its primary thought.

Over time, there has been a radicalization of Hizb ul Tahrir, particularly after the events of 2001. In its publication named Al-Waie (Consciousness), the outfit clearly stated the necessity to carry out suicide attacks. In 2003, a British citizen named Asif Muhammad Hani explodes at the entrance to Tel Aviv bar mike’s place. Asif was found to be a close associate of HuT group. Even in 2004 the Uzbekistan government blamed HuT for organizing an uprising against the arrest of around 23 local businessmen. However, they refused to take responsibility.

Hizb ut Tahrir’s growing influence in Central Asia and particularly its strong opposition towards western ideas has in a way threatened US interest in this region. Continued authoritative regimes have created a conducive environment for the growth of Islamic outfit. Moreover, the proximity of central Asia with the two primary bases of radical groups, Afghanistan and Pakistan, also stimulates HuT’s campaign. After the 2020 riots in USA the Australian Muslim preacher Ismail al-Wahwah of HuT group has said that 'It's time to use this opportunity to stand up, and to come back and to take the leadership again,’ He has suggested that these riots would replace USA as global power by Islamic caliphate. However, its emergence as a dominant geopolitical force is unlikely, as the global war on terrorism which often targets Islamic radicalization will not let such a radical group to thrive. To neutralize the efforts of Hizb ut Tehrir, the basic alternative step for Central Asian region is to improve the socio-economic conditions. Political reforms and a setting up conditions for the achievement of social harmony is very much important.

It should be acknowledged that Hizb ut Tahrir is not the only main actor for the destabilization of Central Asia. Fight for power within sub national identities, regional groups and kingship clan groups and the possible revival of IMU can also threaten the central Asian republics. The “great game” politics of Russia, China, and USA for the dominance of Central Asia could also been seen as confrontational towards Hizb ut Tehrir’s goals.

Pic Courtesy-Snowscat at unsplash.com

(The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent views of CESCUBE.)

Mahima Chouhan
About Mahima Chouhan →

Mahima Chouhan is a Postgraduate student of Politics with Specialization in International Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University. Her area of interest lies in the cultural and political aspects of West Asia, Central Asia and the challenges of Internally Displaced people and refugees.

Related Strategic Analysis